Radeon 530X vs GeForce GT 755M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking562not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.18no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameN14P-?Meso
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 November 2013 (12 years ago)18 April 2017 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768384
Core clock speed980 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1021 MHz
Number of transistors2x 1300 Million1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2x ~50 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data24.50
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width2x 128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed5400 MHz4000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data32 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112.0
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data2.0
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2013 18 April 2017
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 50 Watt

GT 755M SLI has 2400% lower power consumption.

Radeon 530X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 755M SLI and Radeon 530X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 755M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 530X is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 23 votes

Rate GeForce GT 755M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 8 votes

Rate Radeon 530X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 755M SLI or Radeon 530X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.