Quadro K2000M Embedded vs GeForce GT 755M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking553not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.15no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameN14P-?EXK107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 November 2013 (12 years ago)22 March 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768384
Core clock speed980 MHz835 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1058 MHz
Number of transistors2x 1300 Million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2x ~50 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rateno data33.86
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8125 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32
L1 Cacheno data32 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width2x 128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5400 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data57.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1111.0 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.1
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2013 22 March 2012
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 45 Watt

GT 755M SLI has an age advantage of 1 year, and 2150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 755M SLI and Quadro K2000M Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 755M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Quadro K2000M Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI
GeForce GT 755M SLI
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M Embedded
Quadro K2000M Embedded

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 23 votes

Rate GeForce GT 755M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro K2000M Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 755M SLI or Quadro K2000M Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.