RTX 2060 vs GT 755M SLI

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

GT 755M SLI
8.66

RTX 2060 outperforms GT 755M SLI by 321% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking458121
Place by popularitynot in top-10024
Value for money2.0221.00
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameN14P-?Turing TU106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 November 2013 (10 years old)6 January 2019 (5 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349
Current price$545 $397 (1.1x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2060 has 940% better value for money than GT 755M SLI.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681920
Core clock speed980 MHz1320 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1620 MHz
Number of transistors2x 1300 Million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2x ~50 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rateno data201.6

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 755M SLI and GeForce RTX 2060 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width2x 128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed5400 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data336.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMIno data+
G-SYNC supportno data+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkanno data1.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 755M SLI 8.66
RTX 2060 36.50
+321%

RTX 2060 outperforms GT 755M SLI by 321% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GT 755M SLI 20627
RTX 2060 60454
+193%

RTX 2060 outperforms GT 755M SLI by 193% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GT 755M SLI 5673
RTX 2060 27163
+379%

RTX 2060 outperforms GT 755M SLI by 379% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GT 755M SLI 4106
RTX 2060 19338
+371%

RTX 2060 outperforms GT 755M SLI by 371% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GT 755M SLI 28792
RTX 2060 107083
+272%

RTX 2060 outperforms GT 755M SLI by 272% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
−236%
121
+236%
1440p18−20
−322%
76
+322%
4K10−12
−400%
50
+400%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−357%
60−65
+357%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−411%
92
+411%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−558%
79
+558%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−400%
145
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−463%
135
+463%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−357%
60−65
+357%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−390%
103
+390%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−339%
101
+339%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−367%
140
+367%
Hitman 3 21−24
−427%
110−120
+427%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−494%
101
+494%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−580%
102
+580%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−463%
107
+463%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−573%
101
+573%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−333%
78
+333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−433%
64
+433%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−345%
129
+345%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−392%
118
+392%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−357%
60−65
+357%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−371%
99
+371%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−322%
97
+322%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−337%
131
+337%
Hitman 3 21−24
−427%
110−120
+427%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−359%
78
+359%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−415%
67
+415%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−273%
56
+273%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−405%
96
+405%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−656%
136
+656%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−480%
87
+480%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−211%
56
+211%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−358%
55
+358%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−310%
119
+310%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−357%
60−65
+357%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−348%
94
+348%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−283%
88
+283%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−250%
105
+250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−306%
73
+306%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−200%
45
+200%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−485%
76
+485%
Hitman 3 14−16
−379%
65−70
+379%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−247%
52
+247%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−500%
42
+500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−483%
35
+483%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−350%
50−55
+350%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−950%
42
+950%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−500%
75−80
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−600%
27−30
+600%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−371%
65−70
+371%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−485%
76
+485%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−413%
75−80
+413%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−538%
50−55
+538%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−650%
30
+650%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−617%
43
+617%
Hitman 3 8−9
−350%
35−40
+350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−87.5%
15
+87.5%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1200%
26
+1200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−380%
24
+380%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−700%
32
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−750%
51
+750%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−460%
28
+460%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−500%
24
+500%
Battlefield 5 6−7
−783%
53
+783%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−486%
41
+486%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−320%
42
+320%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−490%
59
+490%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−750%
17
+750%

This is how GT 755M SLI and RTX 2060 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RTX 2060 is 236% faster than GT 755M SLI

1440p resolution:

  • RTX 2060 is 322% faster than GT 755M SLI

4K resolution:

  • RTX 2060 is 400% faster than GT 755M SLI

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2060 is 1200% faster than the GT 755M SLI.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 2060 surpassed GT 755M SLI in all 68 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 8.66 36.50
Recency 1 November 2013 6 January 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 175 Watt

The GeForce RTX 2060 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 755M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 755M SLI is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 2060 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI
GeForce GT 755M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 21 vote

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 8849 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.