Radeon RX 5900 XT vs GeForce GT 740A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking981not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.95no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGK208Navi 21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 August 2013 (12 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3844352
Core clock speed980 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1735 MHz
Number of transistors915 million21,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate31.36471.9
Floating-point processing power0.7526 TFLOPS15.1 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs32272
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 300 Watt

GT 740A has 809.1% lower power consumption.

RX 5900 XT, on the other hand, has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 740A and Radeon RX 5900 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 740A is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 5900 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 740A
GeForce GT 740A
AMD Radeon RX 5900 XT
Radeon RX 5900 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 12 votes

Rate GeForce GT 740A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 70 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 740A or Radeon RX 5900 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.