GeForce 7300 GS Low Profile vs GT 740A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking980not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.95no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGK208G72
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 August 2013 (12 years ago)18 January 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed980 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors915 million112 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate31.361.800
Floating-point processing power0.7526 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs324
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz266 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s4.256 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 August 2013 18 January 2006
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 23 Watt

GT 740A has an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

7300 GS Low Profile, on the other hand, has 43.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 740A and GeForce 7300 GS Low Profile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 740A is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 7300 GS Low Profile is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 740A
GeForce GT 740A
NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GS Low Profile
GeForce 7300 GS Low Profile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 12 votes

Rate GeForce GT 740A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate GeForce 7300 GS Low Profile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 740A or GeForce 7300 GS Low Profile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.