Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs GeForce GT 740

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking775not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.19no data
Power efficiency4.10no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGK107GF100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date29 May 2014 (11 years ago)12 June 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$89 $1,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384256
Core clock speed993 MHz475 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)64 Watt142 Watt
Texture fill rate31.7815.20
Floating-point processing power0.7626 TFLOPS0.4864 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs3232
L1 Cache32 KB512 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length145 mm241 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1792 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz702 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.19 GB/s89.86 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.02.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 May 2014 12 June 2011
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1792 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 64 Watt 142 Watt

GT 740 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 128.6% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 121.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 740 and Quadro 4000 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 740 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro 4000 Mac Edition is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
GeForce GT 740
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1377 votes

Rate GeForce GT 740 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 15 votes

Rate Quadro 4000 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 740 or Quadro 4000 Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.