Radeon 630 vs GeForce GT 740 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated755
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data5.75
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGK106Polaris 23
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date14 April 2015 (10 years ago)13 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384512
Core clock speed1050 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1218 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate33.6038.98
Floating-point processing power0.8064 TFLOPS1.247 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs3232
L1 Cache32 KB128 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.19 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 April 2015 13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 50 Watt

Radeon 630 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 30% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 740 OEM and Radeon 630. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 740 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 630 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 OEM
GeForce GT 740 OEM
AMD Radeon 630
Radeon 630

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 17 votes

Rate GeForce GT 740 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 34 votes

Rate Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 740 OEM or Radeon 630, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.