ATI Radeon IGP 340M vs GeForce GT 730M
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 939 | 1592 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 4.49 | no data |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Rage 6 (2000−2007) |
| GPU code name | GK107 | RS200 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 20 January 2013 (12 years ago) | 5 October 2002 (23 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 2 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 183 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 180 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,270 million | 30 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 23.20 | 0.37 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.5568 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 16 | 2 |
| TMUs | 32 | 2 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | AGP 4x |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | System Shared |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | no data |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | no data |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | no data |
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | no data |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | no data |
| HDMI | + | - |
| HDCP content protection | + | - |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | - |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | - |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | - |
| Optimus | + | - |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 API | 7.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | N/A |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 22 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4 | no data |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6 | no data |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4 | no data |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Escape from Tarkov | 6−7 | no data |
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6 | no data |
| Fortnite | 8−9 | no data |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
+450%
|
2−3
−450%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 4−5 | no data |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
+83.3%
|
6−7
−83.3%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
+69.6%
|
21−24
−69.6%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6 | no data |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4 | no data |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 52
+550%
|
8−9
−550%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 21−24
+214%
|
7−8
−214%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 6−7 | no data |
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6 | no data |
| Fortnite | 8−9 | no data |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
+450%
|
2−3
−450%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 4−5 | no data |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 3−4 | no data |
| Metro Exodus | 3−4 | no data |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
+83.3%
|
6−7
−83.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
+69.6%
|
21−24
−69.6%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6 | no data |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 21−24
+214%
|
7−8
−214%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 6−7 | no data |
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6 | no data |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
+450%
|
2−3
−450%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
+83.3%
|
6−7
−83.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
+69.6%
|
21−24
−69.6%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 8−9 | no data |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 14−16 | no data |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20 | no data |
| Valorant | 14−16 | no data |
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | no data |
| Escape from Tarkov | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4 | no data |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 3−4 | no data |
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Valorant | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | no data |
| Dota 2 | 4−5 | no data |
| Escape from Tarkov | 1−2 | no data |
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | no data |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | no data |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GT 730M is 550% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- GT 730M performs better in 19 tests (95%)
- there's a draw in 1 test (5%)
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
