HD Graphics 3000 vs GeForce GT 730M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GT 730M
2013
4 GB DDR3, 33 Watt
2.11
+220%

GeForce GT 730M outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by a whopping 220% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking8281147
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Gen. 6 Sandy Bridge (2011)
GPU code nameGK107Sandy Bridge
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 January 2013 (11 years ago)1 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Current price$1000 $476

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GT 730M and HD Graphics 3000 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38412
Core clock speed725 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million995 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Wattunknown
Texture fill rate23.2013.80
Floating-point performance552.2 gflops20.4 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 730M and HD Graphics 3000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Standard memory configurationDDR3/GDDR5no data
Memory bus width64/128 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 - 2000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+no data
HDCP content protection+no data
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+no data
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+no data
Optimus+no data
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.53.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 730M 2.11
+220%
HD Graphics 3000 0.66

GeForce GT 730M outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by 220% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 730M 815
+221%
HD Graphics 3000 254

GeForce GT 730M outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by 221% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GT 730M 6788
+333%
HD Graphics 3000 1568

GeForce GT 730M outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by 333% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GT 730M 7152
+186%
HD Graphics 3000 2503

GeForce GT 730M outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by 186% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD23
+156%
9
−156%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 0−1
Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Hitman 3 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 0−1
Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Hitman 3 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

This is how GT 730M and HD Graphics 3000 compete in popular games:

  • GT 730M is 156% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GT 730M is 200% faster than the HD Graphics 3000.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GT 730M is ahead in 30 tests (94%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.11 0.66
Recency 1 January 2013 1 February 2011
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB System Shared
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm

The GeForce GT 730M is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 3000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M
GeForce GT 730M
Intel HD Graphics 3000
HD Graphics 3000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 245 votes

Rate GeForce GT 730M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 2178 votes

Rate HD Graphics 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.