GeForce MX450 12W vs GT 730A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking973not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.12no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK208TU117S
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 July 2014 (11 years ago)15 August 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384896
Core clock speed719 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speedno data930 MHz
Number of transistors915 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate23.0152.08
Floating-point processing power0.5522 TFLOPS1.667 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs3256
L1 Cache32 KB896 KB
L2 Cache128 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s80 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.57.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2014 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 12 Watt

MX450 12W has an age advantage of 6 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 175% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 730A and GeForce MX450 12W. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A
GeForce GT 730A
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 12W
GeForce MX450 12W

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 25 votes

Rate GeForce GT 730A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 6 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 12W on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 730A or GeForce MX450 12W, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.