FirePro S4000X vs GeForce GT 730A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking905not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.01no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameGK208Venus
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 July 2014 (10 years ago)7 August 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384640
Core clock speed719 MHz725 MHz
Boost clock speedno data775 MHz
Number of transistors915 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate23.0131.00
Floating-point processing power0.5522 TFLOPS0.992 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs3240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Form factorno dataMXM-A

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s72 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Dual-link DVI support-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2014 7 August 2014
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 45 Watt

GT 730A has 36.4% lower power consumption.

S4000X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 730A and FirePro S4000X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 730A is a notebook graphics card while FirePro S4000X is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A
GeForce GT 730A
AMD FirePro S4000X
FirePro S4000X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 15 votes

Rate GeForce GT 730A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro S4000X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.