Radeon RX 560 XT vs GeForce GT 720A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1047not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.15no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGF117Ellesmere
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 July 2014 (11 years ago)13 March 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores961792
Core clock speed775 MHz973 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1073 MHz
Number of transistors585 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate12.40120.2
Floating-point processing power0.2976 TFLOPS3.846 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs16112
L1 Cache128 KB448 KB
L2 Cache128 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz1650 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s211.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2014 13 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 150 Watt

GT 720A has 354.5% lower power consumption.

RX 560 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 720A and Radeon RX 560 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 720A is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 560 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 720A
GeForce GT 720A
AMD Radeon RX 560 XT
Radeon RX 560 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 15 votes

Rate GeForce GT 720A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 275 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 720A or Radeon RX 560 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.