Radeon RX 7600M XT vs GeForce GT 720 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated159
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 3 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGK107Navi 33
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date29 October 2017 (6 years ago)5 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922048
Core clock speed993 MHz1280 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2300 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt120 Watt (75 - 120 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate15.89320.0
Floating-point processing power0.3813 gflops20.48 gflops
ROPs1664
TMUs16128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1782 MHz18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGAPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 October 2017 5 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 120 Watt

GT 720 OEM has 140% lower power consumption.

RX 7600M XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 720 OEM and Radeon RX 7600M XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 720 OEM is a desktop card while Radeon RX 7600M XT is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 OEM
GeForce GT 720 OEM
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 7600M XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate GeForce GT 720 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 61 vote

Rate Radeon RX 7600M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.