FirePro S9300 X2 vs GeForce GT 710M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1149not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.28no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGF117Capsaicin
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date9 January 2013 (13 years ago)31 March 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores964096 ×2
Core clock speed775 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors585 million8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate12.40217.6 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.2976 TFLOPS6.963 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs864 ×2
TMUs16256 ×2
L1 Cache128 KB1 MB
L2 Cache128 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB ×2
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed900 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s512.0 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 January 2013 31 March 2016
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 300 Watt

GT 710M has 1900% lower power consumption.

S9300 X2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 710M and FirePro S9300 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 710M is a notebook graphics card while FirePro S9300 X2 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M
GeForce GT 710M
AMD FirePro S9300 X2
FirePro S9300 X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 266 votes

Rate GeForce GT 710M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 8 votes

Rate FirePro S9300 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 710M or FirePro S9300 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.