GeForce GT 710 vs Radeon HD 7660D

Place in performance ranking	988	903
Place by popularity	not in top-100	52
Value for money	0.03	0.04
Architecture	Terascale 3 (2010−2013)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	Trinity	GK208B
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	26 September 2012 (11 years old)	27 March 2014 (10 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)	$122	$34.99
Current price	$41 (0.3x MSRP)	$81 (2.3x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GT 710 has 33% better value for money than HD 7660D.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	192
CUDA cores	no data	192
Core clock speed	633 MHz	954 MHz
Boost clock speed	800 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,303 million	915 million
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	19 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	95 °C
Texture fill rate	19.20	15.26
Floating-point performance	no data	366.3 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	no data	PCI Express 2.0
Interface	IGP	PCIe 2.0 x8
Length	no data	5.7" (14.5 cm)
Height	no data	2.713" (6.9 cm)
Width	IGP	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	2 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	no data	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA
Multi monitor support	no data	3 displays
HDMI	no data	+
HDCP	no data	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision	no data	+
PureVideo	no data	+
PhysX	no data	+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA	no data	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7660D 1.30

GT 710 1.63
+25.4%

GeForce GT 710 outperforms Radeon HD 7660D by 25% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD 7660D 504

GT 710 630
+25%

GeForce GT 710 outperforms Radeon HD 7660D by 25% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD 7660D 997
+5.3%

GT 710 947

Radeon HD 7660D outperforms GeForce GT 710 by 5% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD 7660D 7419
+2%

GT 710 7270

Radeon HD 7660D outperforms GeForce GT 710 by 2% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	17 +113%	8 −113%
1440p	2−3 −50%	3 +50%
4K	5−6 −40%	7 +40%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

+0%

4−5

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Hitman 3	1−2 −400%	5 +400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Hitman 3	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −50%	3 +50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −25%	5 +25%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +33.3%	3 −33.3%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Hitman 3	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Hitman 3	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

This is how HD 7660D and GT 710 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

HD 7660D is 113% faster than GT 710

1440p resolution:

GT 710 is 50% faster than HD 7660D

4K resolution:

GT 710 is 40% faster than HD 7660D

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 7660D is 33.3% faster than the GT 710.
in Hitman 3, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GT 710 is 400% faster than the HD 7660D.

All in all, in popular games:

HD 7660D is ahead in 1 test (3%)
GT 710 is ahead in 17 tests (53%)
there's a draw in 14 tests (44%)

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	1.30	1.63
Recency	26 September 2012	27 March 2014
Cost	$122	$34.99
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	2 GB
Chip lithography	32 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	19 Watt