FirePro S9150 vs GeForce GT 710
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 958 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 58 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.04 | no data |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015) | GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) |
| GPU code name | GK208 | Hawaii |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 27 March 2014 (10 years ago) | 7 August 2014 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $34.99 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 2816 |
| CUDA cores | 192 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 915 million | 6,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 19 Watt | 235 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 15.26 | 158.4 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.3663 TFLOPS | 5.069 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 64 |
| TMUs | 16 | 176 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 267 mm |
| Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | no data |
| Width | 1-slot | 2-slot |
| Form factor | no data | full height / full length |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 320 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA | No outputs |
| Multi monitor support | 3 displays | no data |
| HDMI | + | - |
| HDCP | + | - |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| 3D Vision | + | - |
| PureVideo | + | - |
| PhysX | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 27 March 2014 | 7 August 2014 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 19 Watt | 235 Watt |
GT 710 has 1136.8% lower power consumption.
FirePro S9150, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 710 and FirePro S9150. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GT 710 is a desktop card while FirePro S9150 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
