Tesla K40m vs GeForce GT 705 OEM
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 555 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.05 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 2.33 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | Kepler (2012−2018) |
| GPU code name | GF119 | GK110B |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 27 March 2014 (11 years ago) | 22 November 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $7,699 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 48 | 2880 |
| Core clock speed | 874 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 876 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 292 million | 7,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 29 Watt | 245 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 6.992 | 210.2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.1678 TFLOPS | 5.046 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 48 |
| TMUs | 8 | 240 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 267 mm |
| Width | 1-slot | 2-slot |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 825 MHz | 1502 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 13.2 GB/s | 288.4 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | 3.5 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 27 March 2014 | 22 November 2013 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 12 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 29 Watt | 245 Watt |
GT 705 OEM has an age advantage of 4 months, and 744.8% lower power consumption.
Tesla K40m, on the other hand, has a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 705 OEM and Tesla K40m. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GT 705 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Tesla K40m is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
