ATI Radeon X300 vs GeForce GT 650M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking835not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.84no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameGK107RV370
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date22 March 2012 (14 years ago)1 September 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speedUp to 900 MHz375 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,270 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt36 Watt
Texture fill rate30.401.500
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs324
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3\GDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 80.0 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API9.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.52.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 March 2012 1 September 2004
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 36 Watt

GT 650M has an age advantage of 7 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 293% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X300, on the other hand, has 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 650M and Radeon X300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 650M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X300 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 514 votes

Rate GeForce GT 650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 41 votes

Rate Radeon X300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 650M or Radeon X300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.