ATI Radeon 9250 vs GeForce GT 650M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6951609
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameN13E-GERV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date22 March 2012 (14 years ago)1 March 2004 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed790 MHz240 MHz
Boost clock speed835 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data36 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Texture fill rateno data0.96
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2x2 GB64 MB
Memory bus width2x 128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed4000 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data3.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX118.1
OpenGLno data1.4
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p79no data
Full HD50no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 7−8 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 no data
Far Cry 5 14−16 no data
Fortnite 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 5 12−14 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 no data
Valorant 55−60 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 139 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 no data
Dota 2 40−45 no data
Far Cry 5 14−16 no data
Fortnite 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 5 12−14 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Metro Exodus 9−10 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data
Valorant 55−60 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 no data
Dota 2 40−45 no data
Far Cry 5 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data
Valorant 55−60 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 27−30 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4 no data
Metro Exodus 3−4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 no data
Valorant 50−55 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 9−10 no data
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 9−10 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 no data
Valorant 21−24 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 4−5 no data
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 March 2012 1 March 2004
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

GT 650M SLI has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 650M SLI and Radeon 9250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 650M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9250 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 28 votes

Rate GeForce GT 650M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 56 votes

Rate Radeon 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 650M SLI or Radeon 9250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.