ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500 vs GeForce GT 650M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking693not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameN13E-GER200
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date22 March 2012 (13 years ago)14 November 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed790 MHz230 MHz
Boost clock speed835 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data60 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Texture fill rateno data1.840
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2x2 GB128 MB
Memory bus width2x 128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4000 MHz190 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.08 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX118.1
OpenGLno data1.4
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 March 2012 14 November 2001
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

GT 650M SLI has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 650M SLI and All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 650M SLI is a notebook graphics card while All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M SLI
GeForce GT 650M SLI
ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500
All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 28 votes

Rate GeForce GT 650M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 2 votes

Rate All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 650M SLI or All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.