Radeon Pro 575 vs GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1010not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.44no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGK107Polaris 20
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date12 July 2012 (13 years ago)5 June 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842048
Core clock speed900 MHz1096 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate28.80140.3
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPS4.489 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs32128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1254 MHz1695 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.26 GB/s217.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 July 2012 5 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 120 Watt

GT 650M Mac Edition has 166.7% lower power consumption.

Pro 575, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition and Radeon Pro 575. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 575 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
AMD Radeon Pro 575
Radeon Pro 575

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 22 votes

Rate GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 98 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 575 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition or Radeon Pro 575, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.