RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1029not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.47no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGK107AD103
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date12 July 2012 (13 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3849728
Core clock speed900 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1680 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate28.80510.7
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPS32.69 TFLOPS
ROPs16112
TMUs32304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76
L1 Cache32 KB9.5 MB
L2 Cache256 KB64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1254 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.26 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.08.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 July 2012 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 120 Watt

GT 650M Mac Edition has 166.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition and RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition is a notebook graphics card while RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation
RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 22 votes

Rate GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition or RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.