ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 vs GeForce GT 640M LE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking914not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Power efficiency3.96no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGF108M76
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 May 2012 (12 years ago)14 May 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$849.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresUp to 384120
Core clock speedUp to 500 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors585 million390 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Wattno data
Texture fill rate12.054.000
Floating-point processing power0.289 TFLOPS0.12 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs168

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-II

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3\DDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed785 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 28.8 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 May 2012 14 May 2007
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm

GT 640M LE has an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 640M LE and Mobility Radeon HD 2600. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE
GeForce GT 640M LE
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600
Mobility Radeon HD 2600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 58 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640M LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 37 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.