Radeon R7 350 OEM vs GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking682not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.18no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGK208Oland
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date29 May 2013 (10 years ago)5 May 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$89 no data
Current price$230 (2.6x MSRP)$127

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Core clock speed1046 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1050 MHz
Number of transistors915 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate33.4725.20
Floating-point performance803.3 gflops806.4 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x8
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5008 MHz4500 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.06 GB/s72 GB/s

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI++

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA3.5no data

Pros & Cons Summary


Recency 29 May 2013 5 May 2015
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 65 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 and Radeon R7 350 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM
Radeon R7 350 OEM

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 26 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 37 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.