Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile vs GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 791 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.19 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 5.18 | no data |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015) | Xe-LPG (2023) |
| GPU code name | GK208 | Meteor Lake GT1 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 29 May 2013 (12 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $89 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 1046 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1750 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 915 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 49 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 33.47 | 56.00 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.8033 TFLOPS | 1.792 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | Ring Bus |
| Length | 145 mm | no data |
| Width | 1-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 1252 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.06 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Portable Device Dependent |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 3.5 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 29 May 2013 | 14 December 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 49 Watt | 65 Watt |
GT 640 Rev. 2 has 32.7% lower power consumption.
Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 and Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
