Radeon HD 7560G IGP vs GeForce GT 640 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1003not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.38no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameGK107Devastator Lite
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date24 April 2012 (13 years ago)15 May 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384256
Core clock speed797 MHz496 MHz
Boost clock speedno data760 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate25.5012.16
Floating-point processing power0.6121 TFLOPS0.3891 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs3216
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed891 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 35 Watt

GT 640 OEM has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

HD 7560G IGP, on the other hand, has 42.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 640 OEM and Radeon HD 7560G IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 640 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 7560G IGP is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
GeForce GT 640 OEM
AMD Radeon HD 7560G IGP
Radeon HD 7560G IGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 35 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7560G IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 640 OEM or Radeon HD 7560G IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.