Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics vs GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameGF116Beema
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date24 April 2012 (13 years ago)28 January 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores144128
Core clock speed720 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speedno data655 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate17.284.800
Floating-point processing power0.4147 TFLOPS0.1536 TFLOPS
ROPs244
TMUs248
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache384 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1536 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 April 2012 28 January 2015
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 15 Watt

R3 Mobile Graphics has an age advantage of 2 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand and Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
AMD Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics
Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 5 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 50 votes

Rate Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand or Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.