ATI Radeon 9200 vs GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1596
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.03
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGF116RV280
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date24 April 2012 (13 years ago)1 May 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores144no data
Core clock speed720 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate17.281.000
Floating-point processing power0.4147 TFLOPSno data
ROPs244
TMUs244
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache384 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB128 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 April 2012 1 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 28 Watt

GT 640 OEM Rebrand has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200, on the other hand, has 168% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand and Radeon 9200. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 6 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 56 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand or Radeon 9200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.