GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs GT 640 OEM Rebrand

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGF116GT200B
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date24 April 2012 (13 years ago)23 July 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores144192
Core clock speed720 MHz576 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt182 Watt
Texture fill rate17.2836.86
Floating-point processing power0.4147 TFLOPS0.4769 TFLOPS
ROPs2428
TMUs2464
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache384 KB224 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length145 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB896 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit448 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz999 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s111.9 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.11.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 April 2012 23 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 896 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 182 Watt

GT 640 OEM Rebrand has an age advantage of 3 years, a 71.4% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 142.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand and GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 6 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 10 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand or GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.