ATI Graphics Xpression vs GeForce GT 630M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1084not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.89no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Mach (1992−1997)
GPU code nameGF108Mach64
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date22 March 2012 (14 years ago)1 November 1995 (30 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speedUp to 800 MHz40 MHz
Number of transistors585 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm600 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Wattno data
Texture fill rate10.56no data
Floating-point processing power0.2534 TFLOPSno data
ROPs41
TMUs16no data
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCI
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3\GDDR5EDO
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 MB
Memory bus widthUp to 128bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz40 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 32.0 GB/s320.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)N/A
DirectX 11.212 APIno data
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.5N/A
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 March 2012 1 November 1995
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 600 nm

GT 630M has an age advantage of 16 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 630M and Graphics Xpression. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 630M is a notebook graphics card while Graphics Xpression is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1062 votes

Rate GeForce GT 630M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Graphics Xpression on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 630M or Graphics Xpression, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.