Radeon HD 8310E vs GeForce GT 625 OEM

Place in performance ranking	1036	1087
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	0.03	no data
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code name	GF119	Kalindi
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	18 February 2013 (11 years ago)	23 April 2013 (11 years ago)
Current price	$100	no data

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	48	128
Core clock speed	874 MHz	300 MHz
Number of transistors	292 million	1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	29 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	6.992	2.400
Floating-point performance	167.8 gflops	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	IGP
Length	168 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	64 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1650 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	13.2 GB/s	no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	2.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 625 OEM 1.13
+28.4%

HD 8310E 0.88

GeForce GT 625 OEM outperforms Radeon HD 8310E by 28% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 625 OEM 439
+29.1%

HD 8310E 340

GeForce GT 625 OEM outperforms Radeon HD 8310E by 29% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	1.13	0.88
Recency	18 February 2013	23 April 2013
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	System Shared
Chip lithography	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	29 Watt	25 Watt