Radeon RX Vega 9 vs GeForce GT 620 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated670
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data25.86
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGF119Vega Raven Ridge
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2 April 2012 (13 years ago)26 October 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48576
Core clock speed810 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors292 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate6.480no data
Floating-point processing power0.1555 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed898 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth14.37 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGAno data
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2012 26 October 2017
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 15 Watt

RX Vega 9 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 620 OEM and Radeon RX Vega 9. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 620 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 9 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM
GeForce GT 620 OEM
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
Radeon RX Vega 9

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 21 votes

Rate GeForce GT 620 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 29 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 9 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 620 OEM or Radeon RX Vega 9, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.