GeForce 9200M vs GT 610 PCIe x1

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1348
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.19
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGF119C79
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2 April 2012 (13 years ago)15 October 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4816
Core clock speed810 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors292 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)29 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate6.4803.600
Floating-point processing power0.1555 TFLOPS0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x1PCIe 2.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2012 15 October 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 29 Watt 12 Watt

GT 610 PCIe x1 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 9200M, on the other hand, has 141.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 610 PCIe x1 and GeForce 9200M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 610 PCIe x1 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 9200M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 PCIe x1
GeForce GT 610 PCIe x1
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M
GeForce 9200M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 15 votes

Rate GeForce GT 610 PCIe x1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 610 PCIe x1 or GeForce 9200M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.