Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile vs GeForce GT 555M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking998not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.40no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGF106Fenghuang
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date27 October 2011 (14 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresUp to 144no data
Core clock speedUp to 753 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed753 MHz1190 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate12.60no data
Floating-point processing power0.3024 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs24no data
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3\DDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount3 GBno data
Memory bus widthUp to 192 bit/128 Bitno data
Memory clock speedUp to 1569 MHz2400 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 50.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 100 Watt

GT 555M has 185.7% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 24 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 555M and Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
GeForce GT 555M
AMD Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile
Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 197 votes

Rate GeForce GT 555M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 555M or Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.