ATI Radeon X1300 XT AGP vs GeForce GT 550M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1037not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.94no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameGF108RV530
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 January 2011 (14 years ago)12 August 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed475 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors585 million157 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt22 Watt
Texture fill rate7.6002.000
Floating-point processing power0.1824 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs164

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.52.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 January 2011 12 August 2006
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 22 Watt

GT 550M has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1300 XT AGP, on the other hand, has 59.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 550M and Radeon X1300 XT AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 550M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X1300 XT AGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M
GeForce GT 550M
ATI Radeon X1300 XT AGP
Radeon X1300 XT AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 64 votes

Rate GeForce GT 550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon X1300 XT AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 550M or Radeon X1300 XT AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.