GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i vs GT 550M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1048not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.95no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGF108C79
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 January 2011 (14 years ago)18 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9616
Core clock speed475 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors585 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate7.6003.600
Floating-point processing power0.1824 TFLOPS0.0352 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs168
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 January 2011 18 June 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 40 Watt

GT 550M has an age advantage of 2 years, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 14.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 550M and GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 550M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M
GeForce GT 550M
NVIDIA GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i
GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 64 votes

Rate GeForce GT 550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 7 votes

Rate GeForce 9300 nForce 730i on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 550M or GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.