HD Graphics 4000 vs GeForce GT 545

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

GT 545
2011
1536 MB DDR3, 70 Watt
2.84
+143%

GeForce GT 545 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by a whopping 143% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking7541030
Place by popularitynot in top-10037
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.140.13
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Gen. 7 Ivy Bridge (2011−2012)
GPU code nameGF116Ivy Bridge
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date14 May 2011 (13 years ago)23 March 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data
Current price$195 (1.3x MSRP)$91

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GT 545 has 8% better value for money than HD Graphics 4000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14416
Core clock speed720 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million1,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Wattunknown
Texture fill rate17.2820.80
Floating-point performance414.7 gflops33.6 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 545 and HD Graphics 4000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1536 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.0
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.80
CUDA2.1no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 545 2.84
+143%
HD Graphics 4000 1.17

GeForce GT 545 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by 143% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 545 1099
+142%
HD Graphics 4000 454

GeForce GT 545 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by 142% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p27−30
+125%
12
−125%
Full HD24−27
+140%
10
−140%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.84 1.17
Recency 14 May 2011 23 March 2011
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB System Shared
Chip lithography 40 nm 22 nm

The GeForce GT 545 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 545 is a desktop card while HD Graphics 4000 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 545
GeForce GT 545
Intel HD Graphics 4000
HD Graphics 4000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 83 votes

Rate GeForce GT 545 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 4814 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.