ATI Radeon X300 SE vs GeForce GT 540M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1109not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.47no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameGF108RV370
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 January 2011 (14 years ago)1 September 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed672 MHz325 MHz
Number of transistors585 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate10.751.300
Floating-point processing power0.258 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs164
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s3.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API9.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.52.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 January 2011 1 September 2004
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 30 Watt

GT 540M has an age advantage of 6 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 175% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X300 SE, on the other hand, has 16.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 540M and Radeon X300 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 540M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X300 SE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
GeForce GT 540M
ATI Radeon X300 SE
Radeon X300 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 987 votes

Rate GeForce GT 540M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 29 votes

Rate Radeon X300 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 540M or Radeon X300 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.