Radeon 530 Mobile DDR3 vs GeForce GT 540M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1005not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 3.0 (2014−2017)
GPU code nameN12P-GSWeston
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2011 (13 years ago)18 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Current price$283 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96384
Core clock speed672 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1021 MHz
Number of transistors585 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate10.7524.50
Floating-point performance258.05 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 540M and Radeon 530 Mobile DDR3 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5, DDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1800 MBps
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.5 (6.0)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.2.170
CUDA+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2011 18 April 2017
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 50 Watt

GT 540M has 42.9% lower power consumption.

530 Mobile DDR3, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 540M and Radeon 530 Mobile DDR3. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
GeForce GT 540M
AMD Radeon 530 Mobile DDR3
Radeon 530 Mobile DDR3

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 866 votes

Rate GeForce GT 540M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon 530 Mobile DDR3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.