CMP 170HX vs GeForce GT 520MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1227not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.65no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGF119GA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date30 May 2011 (14 years ago)1 September 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores484480
Core clock speed900 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistors292 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate7.200394.8
Floating-point processing power0.1728 TFLOPS12.63 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs8280
Tensor Coresno data280
L1 Cache64 KB13.1 MB
L2 Cache128 KB8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1458 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s1,493 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 APIN/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.5N/A
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 May 2011 1 September 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 250 Watt

GT 520MX has 1150% lower power consumption.

CMP 170HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 520MX and CMP 170HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 520MX is a notebook graphics card while CMP 170HX is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX
GeForce GT 520MX
NVIDIA CMP 170HX
CMP 170HX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 263 votes

Rate GeForce GT 520MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 20 votes

Rate CMP 170HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 520MX or CMP 170HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.