Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile vs GeForce GT 520MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1225not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.68no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Xe-LPG (2023)
GPU code nameGF119Meteor Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 May 2011 (14 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores481024
Core clock speed900 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2250 MHz
Number of transistors292 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate7.200144.0
Floating-point processing power0.1728 TFLOPS4.608 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 May 2011 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 28 Watt

GT 520MX has 40% lower power consumption.

Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 520MX and Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX
GeForce GT 520MX
Intel Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile
Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 263 votes

Rate GeForce GT 520MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 244 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 520MX or Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.