Radeon Instinct MI300 vs GeForce GT 520M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1235not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency4.36no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)CDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameGF108Aqua Vanjaram
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 January 2011 (15 years ago)4 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$59.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4814080
Core clock speed600 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistors585 million153,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate4.8001,496
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPS47.87 TFLOPS
ROPs4no data
TMUs8880
Tensor Coresno data880
L1 Cache64 KB3.4 MB
L2 Cache128 KB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s3,277 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 APIN/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.5N/A
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 January 2011 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 600 Watt

GT 520M has 4900% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 520M and Radeon Instinct MI300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 520M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI300 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
GeForce GT 520M
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300
Radeon Instinct MI300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 466 votes

Rate GeForce GT 520M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 27 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 520M or Radeon Instinct MI300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.