GeForce RTX 3090 SUPER vs GT 520

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1145not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency1.92no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGF119GA102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date13 April 2011 (13 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$59 $1,699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4810752
Core clock speed810 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1695 MHz
Number of transistors292 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)29 Watt400 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature102 °Cno data
Texture fill rate6.480569.5
Floating-point processing power0.1555 TFLOPS36.45 TFLOPS
ROPs4112
TMUs8336

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mm336 mm
Height2.7" (6.9 cm)no data
Width1-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount1 GB (DDR3)24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz (DDR3)21.2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s1,018 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-IHDMIVGA (optional)1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA+8.6

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 GB (DDR3) 24 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 29 Watt 400 Watt

GT 520 has 1279.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 3090 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 520 and GeForce RTX 3090 SUPER. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
GeForce GT 520
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 SUPER
GeForce RTX 3090 SUPER

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 770 votes

Rate GeForce GT 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 430 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3090 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.