Quadro 3000M X2 vs GeForce GT 520 PCIe x1

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGF119EXMF104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date13 April 2011 (14 years ago)22 February 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48240 ×2
Core clock speed810 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors292 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)29 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate6.48018.00 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.1555 TFLOPS0.432 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs432 ×2
TMUs840 ×2
L1 Cache64 KB320 KB
L2 Cache128 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x1MXM-B (3.0)
Length152 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB ×2
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed900 MHz625 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s80 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGAPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.12.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 April 2011 22 February 2011
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 29 Watt 150 Watt

GT 520 PCIe x1 has an age advantage of 1 month, and 417.2% lower power consumption.

3000M X2, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 520 PCIe x1 and Quadro 3000M X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 520 PCIe x1 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro 3000M X2 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCIe x1
GeForce GT 520 PCIe x1
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2
Quadro 3000M X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate GeForce GT 520 PCIe x1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro 3000M X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 520 PCIe x1 or Quadro 3000M X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.