ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT vs GeForce GT 520 OEM

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1148
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.35
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGF119R600
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date20 August 2012 (12 years ago)6 November 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96240
Core clock speed589 MHz601 MHz
Number of transistors292 million720 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)29 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate9.4247.212
Floating-point processing power0.2692 TFLOPS0.2885 TFLOPS
ROPs412
TMUs1612

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s51.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 August 2012 6 November 2007
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 29 Watt 150 Watt

GT 520 OEM has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 417.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 520 OEM and Radeon HD 2900 GT. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM
GeForce GT 520 OEM
ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
Radeon HD 2900 GT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 28 votes

Rate GeForce GT 520 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 8 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2900 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.