GT 440 vs GT 820M

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

GT 820M
1.48

GT 440 outperforms GT 820M by 34% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking933843
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.020.07
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGF117GF108
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date27 November 2013 (10 years old)1 February 2011 (13 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$79
Current price$310 $160 (2x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GT 440 has 250% better value for money than GT 820M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9696
CUDA coresno data96
Core clock speed775 MHz810 MHz
Number of transistors585 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data98 °C
Texture fill rate12.4013.0 billion/sec
Floating-point performance297.6 gflops311.04 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0 x 16
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data5.7" (14.5 cm)
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB
Standard memory config per GPUno data1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3)
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s28.8 (DDR3) – 51.2 (GDDR5)

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsHDMIVGADual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMIno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.2
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 820M 1.48
GT 440 1.99
+34.5%

GT 440 outperforms GT 820M by 34% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 820M 573
GT 440 770
+34.4%

GT 440 outperforms GT 820M by 34% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GT 820M 2505
GT 440 2626
+4.8%

GT 440 outperforms GT 820M by 5% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.48 1.99
Recency 27 November 2013 1 February 2011
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

The GeForce GT 440 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 820M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M
GeForce GT 820M
NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
GeForce GT 440

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 105 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1812 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.