GMA 900 vs GeForce GT 440

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking890not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.08no data
Power efficiency2.14no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Generation 3.0 (2005)
GPU code nameGF108Alviso
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed810 MHz333 MHz
Number of transistors585 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature98 °Cno data
Texture fill rate12.961.332
Floating-point processing power0.311 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs164

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16FSB
Length145 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GBSystem Shared
Standard memory config per GPU1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GBno data
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3)System Shared
Memory bandwidth28.8 (DDR3) – 51.2 (GDDR5)no data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsHDMIVGADual Link DVIPortable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0c
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.21.4
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 40 nm 130 nm

GT 440 has a 225% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 440 and GMA 900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 440 is a desktop card while GMA 900 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
GeForce GT 440
Intel GMA 900
GMA 900

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1955 votes

Rate GeForce GT 440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 21 vote

Rate GMA 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.