Radeon Picasso vs GeForce GT 440 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGF106Picasso
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date11 October 2010 (15 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores144640
Core clock speed810 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1301 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate19.4452.04
Floating-point processing power0.4666 TFLOPS1.665 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs2440
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache384 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1536 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth43.2 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 10 Watt

Picasso has a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 550% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 440 OEM and Radeon Picasso. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 OEM
GeForce GT 440 OEM
AMD Radeon Picasso
Radeon Picasso

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 33 votes

Rate GeForce GT 440 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon Picasso on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 440 OEM or Radeon Picasso, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.