Arc A750 vs GeForce GT 440 OEM

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated177
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data56.42
Power efficiencyno data9.59
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGF106DG2-512
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date11 October 2010 (14 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$289

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1443584
Core clock speed810 MHz2050 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2400 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate19.44537.6
Floating-point processing power0.4666 TFLOPS17.2 TFLOPS
ROPs24112
TMUs24224
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth43.2 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 October 2010 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 225 Watt

GT 440 OEM has 246.2% lower power consumption.

Arc A750, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 440 OEM and Arc A750. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 OEM
GeForce GT 440 OEM
Intel Arc A750
Arc A750

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 32 votes

Rate GeForce GT 440 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 854 votes

Rate Arc A750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.