Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition vs GeForce GT 435M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1067not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.81no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGF108Tahiti
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 September 2010 (15 years ago)7 March 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores961792
Core clock speed650 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors585 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate10.4089.60
Floating-point processing power0.2496 TFLOPS2.867 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs16112
L1 Cache128 KB448 KB
L2 Cache256 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data279 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB3 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s240.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API with Feature Level 12.112 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2010 7 March 2013
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 200 Watt

GT 435M has 471.4% lower power consumption.

HD 7950 Mac Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 435M and Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 435M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
GeForce GT 435M
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 6 votes

Rate GeForce GT 435M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 22 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 435M or Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.